Psi, I don't think that the makers make any claims to be Christian. If the PZ Myers account of the interviews are correct then the makers have been dishonest. Dishonesty is not Christian behaviour. I still think it is interesting however.
Wow, psilordinary, you're just too smart for me. So, then, I guess I need to be an atheist in order to engage in unethical filming behaviour, as in March of the Dodos. Doh!
Possibly the producers had bought the common line that the issue is Bible-literalism versus science. They then decided otherwise, after interviews with Darwinists and with ID theorists, and changed the name and theme of the movie. So there may have been no dishonesty at all?
4 comments:
What do you think about the way the interviews for this film were obtained?
Is this "Christian" behaviour in your book?
Psi,
I don't think that the makers make any claims to be Christian. If the PZ Myers account of the interviews are correct then the makers have been dishonest. Dishonesty is not Christian behaviour.
I still think it is interesting however.
Wow, psilordinary, you're just too smart for me. So, then, I guess I need to be an atheist in order to engage in unethical filming behaviour, as in March of the Dodos. Doh!
Possibly the producers had bought the common line that the issue is Bible-literalism versus science. They then decided otherwise, after interviews with Darwinists and with ID theorists, and changed the name and theme of the movie. So there may have been no dishonesty at all?
Post a Comment