ID - Untestable? Unfalsifiable?
The opponents of ID cannot have it both ways...or as the saying goes they cannot have their cake and eat it.
If ID is not testable or falsifiable then it can never be argued that examples of so called "bad design" show that ID is wrong. If ID is not testable or falsifiable then the critics who claim this should attack Ken Miller for presenting the Type3 Secretory system as evidence that ID is wrong.
An untestable and unfalsifiable hypothesis is "not even wrong." As far as hypotheses go that was the ultimate insult....but a hypothesis that is "not even wrong" cannot be shown to be wrong.
If ID made no specific hypotheses that could in principle be shown to be untrue then why are anti-ID people so keen on the Type 3 Secretory system....
By presenting the Type 3 secretory system they are proclaiming that ID is a testable and falsifiable hypothesis and that we have tested it and found it is wrong.
You cannot say the ID is untestable and unfalsifiable.....and then say.... we have proved that it is wrong.
Which way it is to be....you can't have it both ways.